Civics Game Argument Wars and the Our Courts Learning Games
Our Courts was a web project of retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor that released three online games for middle school students in 2009 and 2010. Argument Wars, the best known of them, is still listed as a playable civics game on the iCivics educator site.
What the Our Courts games were
Our Courts was a web-based education project built on one idea: middle school students understand civics better when they do it than when they read about it. Retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor conceived it because she worried that students lacked the information and tools for civic participation, and that civics teachers needed better materials and support. Three lead partners ran the initiative: Georgetown University Law Center, the College of Teacher Education and Leadership at Arizona State University, and the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University.
Three online games came out of it. Do I Have A Right? and Supreme Decision launched in August 2009, and Argument Wars followed in February 2010. Each one puts the player in a legal role and asks for reasoning, not recall.
The three games and their makers
| Game | Made by | What the player does |
|---|---|---|
| Do I Have A Right? | Filament Games | Runs a constitutional law firm, hires lawyers with different talents and matches them to clients with Bill of Rights questions |
| Supreme Decision | Cabengo, with development partner Studio Mobile | Acts as a clerk to a Supreme Court justice and helps decide a First Amendment case |
| Argument Wars | Filament Games | Argues landmark Supreme Court cases as a lawyer in front of a judge |
How each civics game plays
In Argument Wars the player advances arguments and backs each one with supports. Points with the judge depend on how carefully the arguments and evidence are weighed, and a misstep by the opponent is the chance to pop their bubble. The first release offered five cases: New Jersey v. T.L.O., Brown v. Board of Education, Miranda v. Arizona, Texas v. Johnson and Gideon v. Wainwright.
Supreme Decision is built around a fictional case modeled loosely on Tinker v. Des Moines. A student has been suspended for wearing a T-shirt with a favorite band's logo, against school policy. The player watches animated disagreements between pairs of justices and decides whether the shirt deserves the protection given to political speech. Cabengo also designed the identity and website of the whole project.
Do I Have A Right? turns the Bill of Rights into a business game. The firm starts obscure, takes on cases of varying validity and grows toward a distinguished reputation.
What is true today
The ourcourts.org address now leads to a listing that offers the domain for sale, so the original project site is gone. The game that carried on is Argument Wars. The iCivics educator site has a page titled "Play Argument Wars", describing a Supreme Court simulation where students "Argue real Supreme Court cases, and put your lawyering skills to the test." It lists grade bands 6-8 and 9-12.
The case list has grown from five to nine. The page now names Bond v. United States, Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, In Re Gault, Miranda v. Arizona, New Jersey v. T.L.O., Snyder v. Phelps and Texas v. Johnson. iCivics describes itself as founded in 2009 by Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Current pages for Do I Have A Right? and Supreme Decision are not confirmed here.
Questions about the Our Courts games
Where can I play Argument Wars now?
On the iCivics educator site, which has a page titled "Play Argument Wars". It lists grades 6-8 and 9-12 and nine Supreme Court cases.
Is the Our Courts website still online?
No. In November 2026 the ourcourts.org address led to a listing offering the domain for sale.
Who made the Our Courts civics games?
Filament Games built Argument Wars and Do I Have A Right?. Cabengo designed Supreme Decision with Studio Mobile and also created the project's identity and website.
